May. 2nd, 2003 08:11 am
FOUR stars? From BALTAKE? What the hell?
Well, the SF Chronicle's review of X2 proves that the reviewer has no concept of the source material. Such is to be expected, I suppose.
Sacramento's Joe Baltake, however, with whom I usually disagree vehemently, gives it four stars -- higher than he rated the first movie, and higher than he rated many of 2002 and 2003's "highbrow" films.
Ok, this is now three superhero movies Baltake has given a thumbs up . . . I better start looking for the Apocalypse.
Here's part of what he says (No spoilers here):
Sacramento's Joe Baltake, however, with whom I usually disagree vehemently, gives it four stars -- higher than he rated the first movie, and higher than he rated many of 2002 and 2003's "highbrow" films.
Ok, this is now three superhero movies Baltake has given a thumbs up . . . I better start looking for the Apocalypse.
Here's part of what he says (No spoilers here):
The original "X-Men," released in 2000, worked as a brilliant, self-contained single movie. But now, with the inevitable sequel on hand -- called "X2: X-Men United" -- we can see exactly what Bryan Singer had in mind when he designed that first film.
Actually, "X-Men" wasn't so much a first film or even a prequel, but rather, a primer. It was a quick 95-minute introduction to a handful of the 100 or so characters that populate the universe created by Stan Lee and Jack Kirby in 1963 for their beloved Marvel Comics series. The original film was all setup, albeit a masterful one, that used its limited time wisely on compelling ideas about intolerance and alienation before culminating in the kind of bravura action set piece that audiences expect. Once he had us hooked, director Singer gave us what we wanted.
"X2: X-Men United," despite what its title implies, feels more like a first film in a series -- and what promises to be a gratifying series of movies in which Lee and Kirby's fascinating characters multiply and their lives intersect.