Mar. 31st, 2003 06:23 am
(no subject)
I'm noticing a disturbing trend, wherein anything appearing in "alternate" news sources -- anything not CNN/BBC/etc. -- is automatically considered 100% true by those who consider themselves to be part of the "counterculture", no matter how wacky, unlikely, or plain unreasonable it sounds. These people tend to forget that "objective reporting" is a myth, and that every news source has a bias, and every news source is dependent on the sources it uses, as well as the reporter's biases and goals -- which are not always to tell the whole story or to even tell the truth.
A related phenomenon is the belief that activists always tell the whole truth -- at least, those who agree with the listener. Operation Rescue lies but Planned Parenthood doesn't, or vice versa. Ugh. You know what? They both distort things from time to time, they both overreact and commit logical fallacies every day.
Pro-war or anti-war, pro-Bush or anti-Bush, everyone has their biases and their distorted truths. Just because Kyle from "Silly Punk Band #472" says the government broke down his door and threatened him doesn't mean it really did. Just because Jeb from "Scary Militia Group #37" says the liberals and the homosexuals and the atheists are killing America doesn't mean they really are.
Now, I'm not saying this has never happened, and I'm not saying that nothing on, oh, Alternet or even Ain't It Cool News is true. Sometimes it is. What I'm saying is that just because something's in print -- no matter where it's in print -- doesn't make it true. And I wish more people read the news with a grain of salt.
-----------------------------------------
Someone at work (Nancy, for those keeping score at home) said something about the war on Iraq I agree with, so I'm repeating it:
I don't think we should have started this war, but now that we're there, I want them to win and come home safe. But my opposition to the reasons and the very fact we're in it haven't changed.
A related phenomenon is the belief that activists always tell the whole truth -- at least, those who agree with the listener. Operation Rescue lies but Planned Parenthood doesn't, or vice versa. Ugh. You know what? They both distort things from time to time, they both overreact and commit logical fallacies every day.
Pro-war or anti-war, pro-Bush or anti-Bush, everyone has their biases and their distorted truths. Just because Kyle from "Silly Punk Band #472" says the government broke down his door and threatened him doesn't mean it really did. Just because Jeb from "Scary Militia Group #37" says the liberals and the homosexuals and the atheists are killing America doesn't mean they really are.
Now, I'm not saying this has never happened, and I'm not saying that nothing on, oh, Alternet or even Ain't It Cool News is true. Sometimes it is. What I'm saying is that just because something's in print -- no matter where it's in print -- doesn't make it true. And I wish more people read the news with a grain of salt.
-----------------------------------------
Someone at work (Nancy, for those keeping score at home) said something about the war on Iraq I agree with, so I'm repeating it:
I don't think we should have started this war, but now that we're there, I want them to win and come home safe. But my opposition to the reasons and the very fact we're in it haven't changed.